🔗 Share this article

Europe felt a moment of respite on Monday, as the crisis sparked by the presentation of a new 28-article proposal for ending the war appeared – briefly – to have been stabilised. A senior US official spoke of "notable headway" after Ukraine-US talks in Geneva. On Monday night, the Kremlin made its retaliation: a renewed assault of rocket attacks on Kyiv.

The Cycle of Diplomacy and Destruction

The succession of contrasting events captured the harsh reality of the outgoing year. By day, political struggles are conducted: optimistic declarations are delivered from multiple capitals. Significant resources is expended on restraining certain initiatives. By night, Moscow clearly shows the world that, for them, military action persists as the key method for achieving "settlement".

Nocturnal Warfare

As the offensive progressed into the early hours of Tuesday, the present situation of Ukraine's defenselessness was revealed. Ukraine is equipped to monitor missile launches from across the border, a capability afforded by timely intelligence. From vantage locations, defense planes that had been deployed to counter approaching cruise missiles streaked across the sky – modern combat jets delivered to Ukraine by European allies.

Soon thereafter, Kyiv's anti-aircraft weapons thundered: multiple launches fired to intercept a hostile projectile. This was a advanced protection mechanism at work, most likely provided by partner states. Every launch jolts you unexpectedly, rattling buildings. The moment of terror quickly becomes resigned acknowledgment: perhaps the incoming missile won't hit its mark this time, preventing destruction from catastrophe and additional electricity failures.

Persistent Threats

Soon after, a automatic firearm engaged a unmanned aircraft in the vicinity, part of a defensive team – most likely allied-provided weaponry. Regrettably, the bullets missed the hostile drone – it maintained course toward its objective.

Periodically, this carried on until dawn. Kyiv faced the daybreak reports: multiple fatalities, damage and utility failures in many homes as a result of the evening attack. As customarily, everyone still continued their routines – living the war. But those full day demonstrated Ukraine's vital need on international aid – a need that neighboring countries are evidently unprepared to replace in the immediate future.

Failed Diplomacy

The 28-point plan from US administration sparked intense emotion, debate and serious worry – and briefly redirected concern from Ukraine's most significant graft case in years. Yet, we have witnessed similar scenarios, after previous diplomatic encounters and multilateral gatherings.

Every new proposal from US leadership follows the identical sequence: a diplomatic cavalry charge against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with allied governments, succeeds in resisting. They contain the crisis but never actually achieve victory. This trend will, undoubtedly, continue.

Political Considerations

It is convenient to criticize certain parties of repeatedly advocating Russian terms. But that does not seem to be the whole story. Washington functions according to a premise well known to seasoned negotiators: you cannot secure via talks what you have failed to defend militarily. The White House presumes that it is unfeasible to pressure the Kremlin to surrender the areas that it currently occupies in Ukraine's southern or eastern regions.

The problem is that while accepting these circumstances, Washington does minimal to deter Moscow, through statements or actions, from assuming that the status quo will not evolve additionally in its favour in the near future.

Divergent Views

Therefore, Moscow is convinced that time is on his side – that Ukraine and its allies are approaching exhaustion. Their reason to agree to terms that does not give them the greatest potential benefit is almost completely absent. There may be numerous efforts to end hostilities, but they will persist as long as Russia's government remains supremely confident in the outcome.

On the contrary, Ukraine's government believes that Ukraine can still endure, gradually sacrificing lives and land but averting a complete military breakdown until circumstances change in its favour.

Current Realities

Realistically, there are no actual prerequisites for a armistice. Now, subjective factors are becoming relevant: personal goals to negotiate peace and obtain worldwide acknowledgment, and Kyiv's double obstacles – on one hand, not to alienate a key ally, and on the other, to rally Ukrainians around the flag against any proposal Kyiv finds unacceptable, so that their priority does not shift toward internal issues. And although their objective will now be much harder after recent developments, it remains very improbable that this will change their overall approach.

These two forces are influencing discussions.

Conclusion and Outlook

It took a only one week to terminate the proposed articles of the current initiative. Assertive and inconsistent approach of the matter by Washington, opposition by Ukraine and the other European countries, along with pacifying measures of representatives, and finally, recent disclosures, all served their function.

While new proposals based on established approaches are approaching, Kyiv, London and other European capitals should draw one fundamental conclusion: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to counter diplomatic offensives from Washington that are based on Russian demands and reflect specific hesitation to modify developments, if they stand together and improve their protective measures at a significantly accelerated rate. If they do, neither external pressure nor military threats will be able to overcome them. In the meantime, Ukraine's capacity to defend against evening bombardments will, for the coming months, largely rely on ongoing international assistance.